ANSWER: | A strategy of union acceptance is grounded in the belief that unionization is somewhat inevitable. Management accepts the fact that unionization is a democratic right and part, if not all, of the company’s operations will be unionized. However, this does not mean that management will relinquish control of the operation to the union. Rather, the goal is for management to obtain the best deal that it can to meet its operational needs.
A union resistance strategy in essence contains two somewhat contrasting elements. On one hand, management accepts the right of employees to organize and may follow a union-acceptance strategy in the parts of the organization that are currently unionized. In such unionized workplaces, management will seek to get the best deal that it can and will negotiate in good faith without any attempt to remove the union. On the other hand, management will oppose any further unionization of its workforce. This attempt to stop union inroads may include active opposition to union drives and challenging certification procedures. Examples of union avoidance behaviours include illegally firing union organizers or supporters, restricting union access to the workplace, hiring consultants to assist in an anti-union campaign, training managers to oppose the drive, and threatening to close the operation if it becomes unionized.
Union removal seeks to remove the union wherever it exists in the workforce. This is also sometimes called “union busting.” Again, it essentially has two elements. In unionized workplaces, management endeavours to ensure that unionized employees’ working conditions, wages, and benefits are not superior to those of nonunion employees. In so doing, they attempt to send a message to union members that the union is not getting them a better employment package than they would receive if they were not union members. In nonunionized workplaces, management will try to discourage union activity by sending the message that there is little to gain from unionization and will openly resist any union certification drives.
The strategy of union substitution applies to nonunion operations and workplaces. In essence, taken to its fullest, union substitution is designed to give nonunion employees all of the due process elements (e.g., appeal procedures, clear policies applied consistently), representation (e.g., teams), and compensation advantages of unionization. Take for example the fact that many nonunion employers have employee handbooks that contain policies concerning discipline, discrimination, hours of work, wages, benefits, appeal processes, and performance expectations. In essence, these handbooks are very similar to a collective agreement with the exception that each individual employee signs the book as there is no collective agreement negotiated by a union. Therefore, it can be argued that management, through its HRM policies and practices, attempts to provide a substitute to unionization that makes employees see unionization as unnecessary. This strategy is also called a union avoidance strategy in that one avoids unionization through a substitution strategy. |